MeritValue

SILVERTON ENERGY, INC.

SLTNdata completeness 50%6 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'revenue'; no data for concept 'capex'; no data for concept 'totalDebt'; no data for concept 'investmentsAtFairValue'; no data for concept 'netInvestmentIncome'; no data for concept 'depreciationAmortization'; no data for concept 'gainsOnRealEstateSales'; no data for concept 'realEstateImpairment'; no data for concept 'dividendsPaid'; no data for concept 'incomeTaxExpense'; no data for concept 'pretaxIncome'

i. The business — what you’d actually own
FigureFY 2011FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015
Revenue—————
Net income−$13,9951−$16,5621−$23,5391−$235,7731−$138,7141
Operating cash flow−$8,6412−$8,0123−$16,8294−$175,5735−$54,6565
Capital expenditure—————
Free cash flow (derived)—————
Total debt—————
Cash & equivalents$2,7266$5,1147$8448$11,8908—
Diluted shares11.0M1.73B446.1M52.4M52.4M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal
If you owned
shares
Net assets behind them
−$0.06
your share of equity
Profit it earned you last year
−$0.03
Free cash flow it threw off
—
Debt you’d be carrying
—

10 shares is a claim on −$0.06 of net worth that earned you −$0.03 last year.

iii. Is this a good business?
Moat signal · return on equity
— avg · 5y

Not enough data in the filings for a return-on-capital reading.

seeing a moat in the numbers →
Management signal · capital allocation
+377% shares · 5y

Share count is up 377% over 5 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it.

reading capital allocation →

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.5.0
DCF · Growth Exit 10Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
DCF · Growth Exit 5Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
Earnings Power Value
not applicable
normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined
Graham Number
not applicable
diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts
  1. 10-K/A · period ending 2011-09-30 · accession 0001640334-17-000371 (NetIncomeLoss)
  2. 10-K · period ending 2011-09-30 · accession 0001494733-12-000316 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  3. 10-K · period ending 2012-09-30 · accession 0001424884-14-000008 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  4. 10-K · period ending 2013-09-30 · accession 0001424884-15-000012 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  5. 10-K/A · period ending 2014-09-30 · accession 0001640334-17-000371 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  6. 10-K · period ending 2011-09-30 · accession 0001424884-14-000008 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)
  7. 10-K · period ending 2012-09-30 · accession 0001424884-15-000012 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)
  8. 10-K/A · period ending 2013-09-30 · accession 0001640334-17-000371 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)