Ranger Gold Corp.

RNGCdata completeness 75%11 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'capex'; no data for concept 'totalDebt'; no data for concept 'pretaxIncome'

i. The business — what you’d actually own

Figure	FY 2022	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025	FY 2026
Revenue	$0¹	$0²	$0³	$0⁴	$0⁴
Net income	−$19,675⁵	−$21,504⁶	−$44,161⁷	−$27,846⁸	−$27,062⁸
Operating cash flow	−$19,675⁹	−$18,261¹⁰	−$47,404¹¹	−$29,062¹²	−$24,142¹²
Capital expenditure	—	—	—	—	—
Free cash flow (derived)	—	—	—	—	—
Total debt	—	—	—	—	—
Cash & equivalents	$0¹³	$0¹⁴	$0¹⁵	$0¹⁵	$0¹⁵
Diluted shares	248.0M	248.0M	248.0M	262.3M	242.7M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal

If you owned

Net assets behind them

−$0

your share of equity

Profit it earned you last year

−$0

Free cash flow it threw off

—

Debt you’d be carrying

—

10 shares is a claim on −$0 of net worth that earned you −$0 last year.

iii. Is this a good business?

Moat signal · return on equity

— avg · 5y

Not enough data in the filings for a return-on-capital reading.

Management signal · capital allocation

−2% shares · 5y

Share count is down 2% over 5 years — management has been buying back stock, quietly handing owners a bigger slice.

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.1.0

DCF · Growth Exit 10Y

not applicable

only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

DCF · Growth Exit 5Y

not applicable

only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

Earnings Power Value

not applicable

normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined

Graham Number

not applicable

diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts