JUPITER NEUROSCIENCES, INC.

JUNSdata completeness 63%3 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'capex'; no data for concept 'cash'; no data for concept 'totalDebt'; no data for concept 'interestExpense'; no data for concept 'incomeTaxExpense'; no data for concept 'pretaxIncome'

The thesis, from the filings

JUPITER NEUROSCIENCES, INC. earns about -58% on equity, but has diluted owners by 31% over 3 years — worth asking whether the growth reaches owners. The cash-flow models don't apply cleanly here — the ledger says why below.Whether it’s worth owning at today’s price is the last question — and yours to answer, below.

i. The business — what you’d actually own

Figure	FY 2023	FY 2024	FY 2025
Revenue	—	$0¹	$21,796¹
Net income	−$4.78M²	−$2.44M³	−$8.64M³
Operating cash flow	−$480,953⁴	−$3.91M⁵	−$5.41M⁵
Capital expenditure	—	—	—
Free cash flow (derived)	—	—	—
Total debt	—	—	—
Cash & equivalents	—	—	—
Diluted shares	26.4M	28.8M	34.6M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal

If you owned

Net assets behind them

−$0.53

your share of equity

Profit it earned you last year

−$2.5

Free cash flow it threw off

—

Debt you’d be carrying

—

10 shares is a claim on −$0.53 of net worth that earned you −$2.5 last year.

iii. Is this a good business?

Moat signal · return on equity

-58% avg · 3y

FY23 —FY24 -58%FY25 —

It earned an average -58% on equity over 3 years. Compare that to what it costs to fund the business.

seeing a moat in the numbers →

Management signal · capital allocation

+31% shares · 3y

Share count is up 31% over 3 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it.

reading capital allocation →

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.1.0

DCF · Growth Exit 10Y

not applicable

only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

DCF · Growth Exit 5Y

not applicable

only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

Earnings Power Value

not applicable

normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined

Graham Number

not applicable

diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts

10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001493152-26-014687 (RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax)
10-K · period ending 2023-12-31 · accession 0001641172-25-001261 (NetIncomeLoss)
10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001493152-26-014687 (NetIncomeLoss)
10-K · period ending 2023-12-31 · accession 0001641172-25-001261 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001493152-26-014687 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)