FBC Holding, Inc.
FBCDdata completeness 100%6 fiscal years on fileData notes: no data for concept 'investmentsAtFairValue'; no data for concept 'netInvestmentIncome'; no data for concept 'gainsOnRealEstateSales'; no data for concept 'realEstateImpairment'; no data for concept 'dividendsPaid'
| Figure | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — | — | $01 | $33,5001 |
| Net income | −$3.98M2 | −$2.35M2 | −$7.28M2 | −$6.75M2 | −$3.3M2 |
| Operating cash flow | — | — | — | −$235,1583 | −$367,5843 |
| Capital expenditure | — | — | — | $04 | $04 |
| Free cash flow (derived) | — | — | — | −$235,1583 | −$367,5843 |
| Total debt | — | — | — | $05 | $05 |
| Cash & equivalents | — | — | $06 | $9,4386 | $2,8776 |
| Diluted shares | — | — | — | 128.2M | 2.22B |
Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).
10 shares is a claim on −$0.02 of net worth that earned you −$0.01 and generated −$0 of cash last year, against $0 of debt.
Not enough data in the filings for a return-on-capital reading.
seeing a moat in the numbers →Share count is up 1629% over 5 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it.
reading capital allocation →Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.
Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →
- 10-K/A · period ending 2011-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (Revenues)
- 10-K/A · period ending 2008-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (NetIncomeLoss)
- 10-K/A · period ending 2011-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
- 10-K/A · period ending 2011-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment)
- 10-K/A · period ending 2011-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (LongTermDebtCurrent)
- 10-K/A · period ending 2010-07-31 · accession 0001185185-12-002674 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)