Churchill Capital Corp IX/Cayman
CCIXdata completeness 50%2 fiscal years on fileData notes: no data for concept 'revenue'; no data for concept 'capex'; no data for concept 'totalDebt'; no data for concept 'dilutedShares'; no data for concept 'epsDiluted'; no data for concept 'interestExpense'; no data for concept 'incomeTaxExpense'; no data for concept 'pretaxIncome'
i. The business — what you’d actually own
| Figure | FY 2024 | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — |
| Net income | $8.79M1 | $8.56M1 |
| Operating cash flow | −$1.32M2 | −$3.41M2 |
| Capital expenditure | — | — |
| Free cash flow (derived) | — | — |
| Total debt | — | — |
| Cash & equivalents | $03 | $03 |
| Diluted shares | — | — |
Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).
iii. Is this a good business?
Moat signal · return on equity
— avg · 2y
Not enough data in the filings for a return-on-capital reading.
seeing a moat in the numbers →Management signal · capital allocation
— shares · 2y
Not enough history to read capital allocation.
reading capital allocation →Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.
iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.1.0
DCF · Growth Exit 10Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
DCF · Growth Exit 5Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
Earnings Power Value
not applicable
only 2 years of net income (need ≥3)
Graham Number
not applicable
diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined
Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →
Sources — the receipts
- 10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001193125-26-039696 (NetIncomeLoss)
- 10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001193125-26-039696 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
- 10-K · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001193125-26-039696 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)