The thesis, from the filings
StoneBridge Acquisition II Corp earns about 55% on equity. The cash-flow models don't apply cleanly here — the ledger says why below.Whether it’s worth owning at today’s price is the last question — and yours to answer, below.
i. The business — what you’d actually own
| Figure | FY 2025 |
|---|---|
| Revenue | — |
| Net income | $302,3251 |
| Operating cash flow | −$313,5252 |
| Capital expenditure | — |
| Free cash flow (derived) | — |
| Total debt | — |
| Cash & equivalents | $03 |
| Diluted shares | — |
Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).
iii. Is this a good business?
Moat signal · return on equity
55% avg · 1y
FY25 55%
It earned an average 55% on equity over 1 years. Compare that to what it costs to fund the business.
seeing a moat in the numbers →Management signal · capital allocation
— shares · 1y
Not enough history to read capital allocation.
reading capital allocation →Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.
iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.5.0
Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →
Sources — the receipts
- 10-K · period ending 2025-12-31 · accession 0001829126-26-002474 (NetIncomeLoss)
- 10-K · period ending 2025-12-31 · accession 0001829126-26-002474 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
- 10-K · period ending 2025-12-31 · accession 0001829126-26-002474 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)