MeritValue

Atacama Resources International, Inc.

ACRLdata completeness 88%4 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'capex'; no data for concept 'investmentsAtFairValue'; no data for concept 'netInvestmentIncome'; no data for concept 'depreciationAmortization'; no data for concept 'gainsOnRealEstateSales'; no data for concept 'realEstateImpairment'; no data for concept 'dividendsPaid'

i. The business — what you’d actually own
FigureFY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016
Revenue—$01$02$02
Net income−$154,9753−$782,4313−$282,9164−$1.53M4
Operating cash flow−$16,3025−$7,0056−$97,7047−$882,3627
Capital expenditure————
Free cash flow (derived)————
Total debt——$276,9848$143,8808
Cash & equivalents$6,1989$1,69310$8,47710$17,67010
Diluted shares31.4M31.5M57.2M139.9M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal
If you owned
shares
Net assets behind them
−$0.05
your share of equity
Profit it earned you last year
−$0.11
Free cash flow it threw off
—
Debt you’d be carrying
$0.01

10 shares is a claim on −$0.05 of net worth that earned you −$0.11 last year, against $0.01 of debt.

iii. Is this a good business?
Moat signal · return on equity
— avg · 4y

Not enough data in the filings for a return-on-capital reading.

seeing a moat in the numbers →
Management signal · capital allocation
+346% shares · 4y

Share count is up 346% over 4 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it. Total debt has fallen 48% — deleveraging.

reading capital allocation →

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.5.0
DCF · Growth Exit 10Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
DCF · Growth Exit 5Y
not applicable
only 0 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
Earnings Power Value
not applicable
normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined
Graham Number
not applicable
diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts
  1. 10-K · period ending 2014-12-31 · accession 0001014897-16-000534 (Revenues)
  2. 10-K · period ending 2015-12-31 · accession 0001014897-17-000084 (Revenues)
  3. 10-K · period ending 2013-12-31 · accession 0001617819-15-000011 (NetIncomeLoss)
  4. 10-K · period ending 2015-12-31 · accession 0001014897-17-000084 (NetIncomeLoss)
  5. 10-K · period ending 2013-12-31 · accession 0001617819-15-000011 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  6. 10-K · period ending 2014-12-31 · accession 0001014897-16-000534 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  7. 10-K · period ending 2015-12-31 · accession 0001014897-17-000084 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
  8. 10-K · period ending 2015-12-31 · accession 0001014897-17-000084 (LongTermDebtCurrent)
  9. 10-K · period ending 2013-12-31 · accession 0001014897-16-000534 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)
  10. 10-K · period ending 2014-12-31 · accession 0001014897-17-000084 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)