Quantum Genesis AI Corp.

QTZMdata completeness 75%5 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'totalDebt'

The thesis, from the filings

Quantum Genesis AI Corp. earns about -110% on equity, but has diluted owners by 778% over 5 years — worth asking whether the growth reaches owners. The cash-flow models don't apply cleanly here — the ledger says why below.Whether it’s worth owning at today’s price is the last question — and yours to answer, below.

i. The business — what you’d actually own

Figure	FY 2016	FY 2017	FY 2018	FY 2024	FY 2025
Revenue	$121,327¹	$128,147²	$93,550²	$0³	$0³
Net income	−$3,743⁴	−$32,858⁵	−$28,167⁵	−$178,569⁶	−$199,269⁶
Operating cash flow	−$3,823⁷	−$38,077⁸	−$2,744⁸	−$101,637⁹	−$125,181⁹
Capital expenditure	—	—	$11,900¹⁰	—	—
Free cash flow (derived)	—	—	−$14,644⁸	—	—
Total debt	—	—	—	—	—
Cash & equivalents	$221¹¹	$2,744¹¹	—	$0¹²	$584¹²
Diluted shares	4.0M	5.0M	5.0M	34.7M	35.1M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal

If you owned

Net assets behind them

−$0.13

your share of equity

Profit it earned you last year

−$0.06

Free cash flow it threw off

—

Debt you’d be carrying

—

10 shares is a claim on −$0.13 of net worth that earned you −$0.06 last year.

iii. Is this a good business?

Moat signal · return on equity

-110% avg · 5y

FY16 -37%FY17 -183%FY18 —FY24 —FY25 —

It earned an average -110% on equity over 5 years. Compare that to what it costs to fund the business.

seeing a moat in the numbers →

Management signal · capital allocation

+778% shares · 5y

Share count is up 778% over 5 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it.

reading capital allocation →

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.1.0

DCF · Growth Exit 10Y

not applicable

only 1 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

DCF · Growth Exit 5Y

not applicable

only 1 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable

Earnings Power Value

not applicable

normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined

Graham Number

not applicable

diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts

10-K · period ending 2016-07-31 · accession 0001477932-17-004559 (Revenues)
10-K · period ending 2017-07-31 · accession 0001493152-18-016559 (Revenues)
10-K/A · period ending 2024-07-31 · accession 0001477932-25-008351 (Revenues)
10-K · period ending 2016-07-31 · accession 0001477932-17-004559 (NetIncomeLoss)
10-K · period ending 2017-07-31 · accession 0001493152-18-016559 (NetIncomeLoss)
10-K/A · period ending 2024-07-31 · accession 0001477932-25-008351 (NetIncomeLoss)
10-K · period ending 2016-07-31 · accession 0001477932-17-004559 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
10-K · period ending 2017-07-31 · accession 0001493152-18-016559 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
10-K/A · period ending 2024-07-31 · accession 0001477932-25-008351 (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities)
10-K · period ending 2018-07-31 · accession 0001493152-18-016559 (PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment)
10-K · period ending 2016-07-31 · accession 0001493152-18-016559 (CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue)
10-K/A · period ending 2024-07-31 · accession 0001477932-25-008351 (CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents)