Altamira Therapeutics Ltd.

CYTOFdata completeness 75%6 fiscal years on file

Data notes: no data for concept 'revenue'; no data for concept 'interestExpense'

The thesis, from the filings

Altamira Therapeutics Ltd. earns about -92% on equity, but has diluted owners by 13% over 5 years — worth asking whether the growth reaches owners. The cash-flow models don't apply cleanly here — the ledger says why below.Whether it’s worth owning at today’s price is the last question — and yours to answer, below.

i. The business — what you’d actually own
FigureFY 2019FY 2020FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024
Revenue
Net income−$6.63M1−$8.2M1−$27.8M2−$4.31M2−$8.46M2
Operating cash flow−$9.09M3−$12.8M3−$6.11M3
Capital expenditure$103,0874
Free cash flow (derived)−$6.22M3
Total debt$5.29M5
Cash & equivalents$16,6416$733,7016$998,6246
Diluted shares4.1M12.9M1.2M1.5M4.7M

Superscripts are receipts. Each links to the SEC filing the number came from (full list at the bottom).

ii. Your slice — ownership made literal
If you owned
shares
Net assets behind them
$14.08
your share of equity
Profit it earned you last year
−$18.14
Free cash flow it threw off
−$13.33
Debt you’d be carrying

10 shares is a claim on $14.08 of net worth that earned you −$18.14 and generated −$13.33 of cash last year.

iii. Is this a good business?
Moat signal · return on equity
-92% avg · 5y
FY19 FY20 FY22 FY23 -56%FY24 -129%

It earned an average -92% on equity over 5 years. Compare that to what it costs to fund the business.

seeing a moat in the numbers →
Management signal · capital allocation
+13% shares · 5y

Share count is up 13% over 5 years — owners have been diluted. Worth asking what they got for it. Total debt has held roughly steady.

reading capital allocation →

Signals, not verdicts — read from the filings above. Numbers don’t prove a moat; they show its footprint. You decide.

iv. What it’s worth — engine v0.1.0
DCF · Growth Exit 10Y
not applicable
only 1 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
DCF · Growth Exit 5Y
not applicable
only 1 years of FCF (need ≥3) — model not applicable
Earnings Power Value
not applicable
normalized (5y-median) earnings non-positive — EPV undefined
Graham Number
not applicable
diluted EPS missing or non-positive — Graham Number undefined

Different models answer different questions — which to trust when →

Sources — the receipts
  1. 20-F · period ending 2019-12-31 · accession 0001213900-21-018959 (ProfitLossAttributableToOwnersOfParent)
  2. 20-F · period ending 2022-12-31 · accession 0001213900-25-037199 (ProfitLoss)
  3. 20-F · period ending 2022-12-31 · accession 0001213900-25-037199 (CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities)
  4. 20-F · period ending 2024-12-31 · accession 0001213900-25-037199 (PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities)
  5. 20-F · period ending 2023-12-31 · accession 0001213900-25-037199 (Borrowings)
  6. 20-F · period ending 2022-12-31 · accession 0001213900-25-037199 (CashAndCashEquivalents)